Bank Fraud with Labor Liabilities of Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

Legal silos create fatal loopholes
When labor litigation responds to HR, controls weaken — the impact can reach hundreds of millions in inflated liabilities.

Case Study — European Bank vs. Hidden Liabilities in Brazil

Bank acquisitions usually come with tough integration: cutting costs, adjusting teams, reordering areas. Three years after buying a retail bank in Brazil, a European group discovered what nobody wanted to see on the balance sheet: a labor gap of ~US$ 300 million. The problem was not “just” those directly involved - executives and outsourced offices - but the chain of those who ignored clear signs and, in some cases, were promoted as the fraud grew.

The risk design was accurate: labor law did not respond to corporate law, but reported to HR. In this arrangement, a scheme emerged that inflated shares up to 10 times, directed “deals” at values above the market, and punished offices that refused to participate. The operation, distributed nationally, required constant coordination. The effect: draining cash, corrupted culture, and eroding reputation.

We were called when the board understood that “investigating” was too little - it was necessary to clean up the organization and reorder the board. In situations like this, there is no police that arrives on time or a corporate manual that can do the job. We act as special situation managers: investigator, prosecutor, defender, jury, and recommendation rapporteur - always with a non-negotiable rule: do the right thing, even when the client pressures for scapegoats.

Our approach, in objective lines:

1. Emergency lock: suspension of new agreements, preservation of evidence and Containment reputational.
2. Legal-financial forensics: cross-referencing contracts, petitions, expertise and payment flows; mapping of anomalous patterns by district, period, and office.
3. Influence mapping: who decides, who signs, who profits; Relationship network between interns and third parties.
4. Structured interviews and veracity testing: versions, inconsistencies, incentives; protected whistleblowing.
5. Governance and segregation: repositioning the labor force under the legal system, Exchange of benches, new SLA/KPI and anti-corruption clauses.
6. Recovery counterstrategy: regressive actions, Clawback of fees, civil/disciplinary accountability, and negotiation with critical stakeholders.

Result: dismantle the scheme, immediate reduction of the projected loss, redefinition of governance, and a legal plan to recover values. Most importantly, the bank moved out of the reactive cycle to a proactive control model capable of detecting and blocking future attempts.

What this case teaches any exposed organization in Brazil:

• Structure matters more than intentions. Placing labor under HR is an invitation to asymmetry of control.
• Outsourcing without governance is a strategic risk. Fees, elevations, and turnover saw warning signs — and a money trail.
• Post-M&A requires independent scanning. Sem behavioral and forensic due diligence, “invisible” liabilities always show up — late and expensive.

If you are integrating operations, suspect liabilities out of the curve, or need crisis management with a firm hand and confidentiality, contact us. We act where others don't - and we deliver strategy, cleansing, and recovery.

‍